ABSTRACT
While the precise triggers of gallstone formation remain incompletely understood, it is believed to arise from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. The bile microbiome is being increasingly recognized as a possible contributor to the onset of gallstone disease. The primary objective of this study was to investigate distinctions in the microbial communities within bile specimens from patients with choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones) and cholecystolithiasis (gallbladder stones). We employed massively parallel sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to examine the microbial communities within bile samples obtained from 28 patients with choledocholithiasis (group DS) and cholecystolithiasis (group GS). The taxonomic composition of the bile microbial communities displayed significant disparities between the group DS and the group GS. Within the 16 prevalent genera, only Streptococcus, Ralstonia, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus were predominantly found in the group GS. In contrast, the group DS displayed a more diverse range of genera. The alpha diversity of bile specimens was also notably lower in the group GS compared to the group DS (p = 0.041). Principal coordinate analysis unveiled distinct clustering of bile microbial communities depending on the location of the gallstone. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis, with a score threshold of >3 and the Kruskall-Wallis test (α < 0.05), recognized Bacilli and Lactobacillales as potential taxonomic markers for distinguishing patients with cholecystolithiasis limited to the gallbladder. Significant variations were found in the distribution and diversity of bile microbial communities between patients with choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis. This observation suggests that alterations in the bile microbiome may contribute to the development of gallstones in these patients.
Subject(s)
Choledocholithiasis , Gallstones , Microbiota , Humans , Choledocholithiasis/genetics , Bile , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Microbiota/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: About 10% of patients with gallbladder (GB) stones also have concurrent common bile duct (CBD) stones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after removal of CBD stones using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most widely used method for treating coexisting gallbladder and common bile duct stones. We evaluated the optimal timing of LC after ERCP according to clinical factors, focusing on preoperative relief of jaundice. METHODS: A total of 281 patients who underwent elective LC after ERCP because of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis from January 2010 to April 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the hospital stay, perioperative morbidity, and rate of surgical conversion to open cholecystectomy according to the relief of jaundice before surgery. These enrolled patients were divided into two groups: relief of jaundice before surgery (group 1, n = 125) or not (group 2, n = 156). RESULTS: The initial total bilirubin level was higher in group 1; however, there were no significant differences in the other baseline characteristics including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous surgical history, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and operative time between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (4.5 ± 3.3 vs. 5.5 ± 5.6 days, p = 0.087). However, after ERCP, the waiting time until LC was significantly longer in group 1 (5.0 ± 4.9 vs. 3.5 ± 2.4 days, p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in the conversion rate (3.2% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.518) or perioperative morbidity (4.0% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.348), either. CONCLUSIONS: LC would not be delayed until the relief of jaundice after ERCP since there were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity or surgical conversion rate to open cholecystectomy. Early LC after ERCP may be feasible and safe in patients with cholangitis and cholecystolithiasis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To date, there is controversy regarding unilateral versus bilateral stent placement in patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBSs). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of unilateral and bilateral (stent-in-stent method) stent placements for these patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with inoperable MHBS who underwent endoscopic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement from January 2009 to December 2019. Two groups classified according to the stent procedure method were compared for demographic, procedural, and postprocedure factors. Survival analysis for patency loss and overall survival was also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 236 subjects were included. A superior technical success rate was found in the unilateral stent group (98.8% vs. 82.5%, P < 0.001), whereas the clinical success rate was higher in the bilateral group (85.7% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.028). There was no significant difference with respect to complications or patency loss, and the bilateral group had better overall survival (P < 0.01). In the Cox proportional hazard model, MHBSs from lymph node compression were associated with a higher risk of death (HR = 9.803, P = 0.003). In contrast, bilateral SEMS insertion showed reduced postprocedural mortality (HR = 0.316, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Y-type stent-in-stent bilateral SEMSs are technically difficult but demonstrated more favorable overall survival for palliative bile drainage of inoperable MHBS patients compared to unilateral insertions.
